The BX was only one thing, and that is stable. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me. Don’t get me wrong. Post benchmarks to prove you claims. I don’t have a time machine. But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly competitive products. These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge.
|Date Added:||17 May 2018|
|File Size:||13.40 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. SiS was beating those first versions, with chipsets like the excellent in memory performance.
I have my experience that tells me something completely different. Check out my threads on Vogons marvin section – I benchmarked most slot 1 and socket chipsets last summer.
ABIT VH6T, Socket 370, Intel Motherboard
I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me. And I’m not the only one that came to these results – there are similar threads on amibay, vogons and computerhistory forums.
Anyway, prove your claims before calling my benchmarks wrong. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs.
These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor. Can you prove your findings, or those university degrees are considered proof of everything you post?
The only really good thing they had to show, was their Vinyl Audio. Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person. There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue.
I know what I have seen back then. Don’t get me wrong. Holy blast from the past time Batman!
Sunday, January 1st That’s why you always waited for the A versions. I don’t have a time machine. The replacement was a board with VIA chipset.
But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly competitive products. VIA had a bad name because it was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. And I have to prove nothing to you, as cobtroller have to prove nothing to me.
You can’t forget that kind of disappointment. Both of those statements do not jive with real world testing and benchmarks of the time.
You really don’t have to convince everyone. The BX was only one thing, and that is stable.
It’s true, both from a practical vh6 and a legal one. Every game and testing suite used rendered scores that were equal to or very near identical scores. It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed.
They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases.
ABIT Driver – free motherboard driver downlod
It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. Sorry, but I know what I have seen back then. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years. With a fast AGP 4x card, the performs horribly. Controllwr, don’t get me wrong.